Computing in the real world
SEARCH FOR: IN:
Guest  Level 00    Register Log in

News 

[Processors]
Wednesday 16th July 2008
Intel faces new European antitrust charges 7:29AM, Wednesday 16th July 2008
European regulators are preparing to file new antitrust charges against Intel, expanding a probe into the chipmaker's marketing and sales practices.

The new charges, which could be brought as soon as tomorrow claims the Wall Street Journal, will allege that the world's top chipmaker gave major European retailers inducements not to sell computers that use chips from smaller rival AMD.

Last year, the European Commission in Brussels charged Intel with selling chips below cost and offering customers huge rebates in an illegal attempt to drive AMD out of the market.

AMD has long accused Intel of abusing its dominance of the £140 billion chip market and filed its own lawsuit against Intel in 2005.

Intel's microprocessors currently power over 80 percent of the world's

 
 
ADVERTISEMENT
PCs.

The potential new charges from European regulators would be another blow to Intel, which last month said it faces a formal investigation by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.

"We are continuing to cooperate and really don't know what the commission will do," Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy told the Journal, when asked about the possibility of new charges. "We believe we operate within the law."

A spokesperson for EU antitrust commissioner Neelie Kroes told the paper the Intel probe is "ongoing".

Intel and European antitrust regulation officials could not be immediately reached for comment.

The company also faces similar investigations elsewhere.

The New York state attorney general opened a formal probe of Intel in January to determine if it broke state antitrust laws by trying to squeeze out AMD.

In June, the Korea Fair Trade Commission in Seoul ruled Intel had abused its dominant position in the local market and imposed a fine of £12 million. Intel said it would almost certainly appeal.

Japan's trade commission also concluded in 2005 that Intel had violated that country's anti-monopoly act. Intel said it disagreed with the findings, but accepted the commission's recommendation, a move that allowed it to avoid a trial.

Submit to: Digg  |  Slashdot  |  Del.icio.us  |  Technorati

Related News


Acer Aspire One AOA150-Ab Intel Atom N270 1.60GHz
Intel Atom, 1.6 Ghz, 1024 MB, 120 GB
ASUS Eee PC 2G Surf Intel Celeron 800MHz / 512MB
Intel Celeron M, 0.8 Ghz, 512 MB, 2 GB
Acer Aspire 5920 Gemstone Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 Ghz, 2048 MB, 120 GB
Samsung R700 Santa Rosa Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 2.
Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.1 Ghz, 3072 MB, 320 GB

Acer Aspire One AOA150-Ab Intel Atom N270 1.60GHz
Intel Atom, 1.6 Ghz, 1024 MB, 120 GB
it 247.com
ASUS Eee PC 2G Surf Intel Celeron 800MHz / 512MB
Intel Celeron M, 0.8 Ghz, 512 MB, 2 GB
micro warehouse
Acer Aspire 5920 Gemstone Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 Ghz, 2048 MB, 120 GB
laptops direct
Compare Broadband
Broadband?
Compare 50+ packages
Enter your postcode below:
Powered by:
Top 10 Broadband
Bookstore Top 5